• State Not Answered
  • Replies replies
    5
  • Subscribers subscribers
    16
  • Views views
    305
  • Users 0 members are here
  • Locked Locked
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Recipients lined up alphabetically when reply to all

NovAlf
Hi!
GW 2014 SP2 (and earlier). How is possible on TO (and CC and BCC) row to keep addresses in order they entered by sender? I mean, by default when I choose to reply to all these addresses is (re)ordered alphabetically and address from who I get message ... not the first one, usually it should be. Probably there is some setting for this? I hope. Anyway, I think by default addresses should appear in order as sender set these, meaning, when replying – first one is sender address and other addresses appear in order as sender set.
More thanks, Alar.

Tags:

Parents
  • 0
    Hi Alar,

    I honestly don't think that this behavior can be changed. I suspect that Novell will tell you that this is working as designed.

    Cheers,
  • 0 in reply to 
    Hi and thanks!
    Well, but don't You agree ... this is a bad design. We may argue should this kind of behavior be by default or not, but it should be at least settable. Don't You think!? ... Yeah, I know ...
    https://ideas.microfocus.com/MFI/novell-gw/Idea/Detail/1802
    This kind of little ... thing should be done/fixed by a ... first (next) update/upgrade to follow – we want the GW to be very best, don't we!?
    More thanks, Alar.
  • 0 in reply to 
    On Thu, 05 May 2016 08:26:02 GMT, NovAlf
    <NovAlf@no-mx.forums.microfocus.com> wrote:

    >
    >Hi and thanks!
    >Well, but don't You agree ... this is a bad design. We may argue should
    >this kind of behavior be by default or not, but it should be at least
    >settable. Don't You think!? ... Yeah, I know ...
    >https://ideas.microfocus.com/MFI/novell-gw/Idea/Detail/1802
    >This kind of little ... thing should be done/fixed by a ... first (next)
    >update/upgrade to follow ?we want the GW to be very best, don't we!?
    >More thanks, Alar.

    I would disagree. I think this is good design. Granted, I rarely
    look at the list, but I would want to see them alphabetically so I
    could find a specific person faster. If you want to request it as a
    settable option, I wouldn't argue that point, but I can't see this
    being an issue for most people.
    Ken

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Create and vote for enhancements!
    https://www.novell.com/products/enhancement-request.html
Reply
  • 0 in reply to 
    On Thu, 05 May 2016 08:26:02 GMT, NovAlf
    <NovAlf@no-mx.forums.microfocus.com> wrote:

    >
    >Hi and thanks!
    >Well, but don't You agree ... this is a bad design. We may argue should
    >this kind of behavior be by default or not, but it should be at least
    >settable. Don't You think!? ... Yeah, I know ...
    >https://ideas.microfocus.com/MFI/novell-gw/Idea/Detail/1802
    >This kind of little ... thing should be done/fixed by a ... first (next)
    >update/upgrade to follow ?we want the GW to be very best, don't we!?
    >More thanks, Alar.

    I would disagree. I think this is good design. Granted, I rarely
    look at the list, but I would want to see them alphabetically so I
    could find a specific person faster. If you want to request it as a
    settable option, I wouldn't argue that point, but I can't see this
    being an issue for most people.
    Ken

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Create and vote for enhancements!
    https://www.novell.com/products/enhancement-request.html
Children

Resources

Support
Documentation
Learning Services
Partner Programs
Privacy
Compliance
Help
Company
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Cookies Preferences
Accessibility
Anti-Slavery Statement
Support
Contact Us
Careers
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of OpenText. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.), Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, or Micro Focus. As of January 31, 2023, the Material is now offered by OpenText, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP, Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE, and Micro Focus marks is historical in nature and the HP, Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE, and Micro Focus marks are the property of their respective owners.