Performance difference SOAP with and w/o SSL

Has anyone compared the same archive job with and w/o SOAP over SSL? What is your experience?


I realized a big slowness archiving with SSL in two environments. 20 to 50 times slower. In my opinion, 50-100% slower can be acceptable.

Support  confirmed it in their lab.

Here are couple of examples. Just using the same Profile (All Items in Mailbox) and switch SSL on or off.

Parents
  • Verified Answer

    +1

    The problem has been resolved by support.

    changing default HTTP,SOAP to SOAP,HTTP makes my retain system be 10-15 times faster with SSL.

    vi /opt/beginfinite/retain/RetainWorker/WEB-INF/classes/config/attachment.properties
    # This properties file belongs to the Worker.
    # --------------------------------------------------------
    #attachment.handler.list= HTTP,SOAP
    attachment.handler.list= SOAP,HTTP

  • 0   in reply to 

    I had a customer make this change yesterday and they went from 1.2 m/s to 6.33 m/s with SSL enabled.  I wish it had the very high m/s performance when SSL is disabled on SOAP.

  • 0   in reply to   

    Ed, maybe a crazy idea but I tried it.

    I have created a second POA in my test environment. This new POA has been configured with insecure SOAP.

    Afterwards I had to re-configure my Retain GroupWise Module.

    And my Worker1.

    Now I use secure SOAP for GMS and web client but insecure SOAP for Retain ... 


    Use "Verified Answers" if your problem/issue has been solved!

Reply
  • 0   in reply to   

    Ed, maybe a crazy idea but I tried it.

    I have created a second POA in my test environment. This new POA has been configured with insecure SOAP.

    Afterwards I had to re-configure my Retain GroupWise Module.

    And my Worker1.

    Now I use secure SOAP for GMS and web client but insecure SOAP for Retain ... 


    Use "Verified Answers" if your problem/issue has been solved!

Children